<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629 version 1.2.13 -->
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY RFC4760 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4760.xml">
<!-- ENTITY USECASES PUBLIC ''
      'https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.draft-geng-rtgwg-cfn-dyncast-ps-usecase-00.xml'-->
]>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc text-list-symbols="o*+-"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="no"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc strict="yes"?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<rfc category="info" docName="draft-wang-space-computing-consideration-00"
     ipr="trust200902" submissionType="IETF">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="">Consideration for Space-Based Computing Infrastructure
    Network</title>

    <author fullname="Jing Wang" initials="J." surname="Wang">
      <organization>China Mobile</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No.32 XuanWuMen West Street</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <code>100053</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <email>wangjingjc@chinamobile.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Pengfei Zhang" initials="P." surname="Zhang">
      <organization>Beihang University</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No.37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <code>100191</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <email>zhangpengfei@buaa.edu.cn</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="2" month="March" year="2026"/>

    <workgroup>space</workgroup>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document presents considerations for a Space-Based Computing
      Infrastructure Network from use cases and requirements.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction" title="Introduction">
      <t>In recent years, the global satellite industry has experienced rapid
      development. The deployment of low-Earth orbit satellite constellations,
      advancements in satellite communication technologies, and improved space
      launch capabilities have propelled global satellite networks towards a
      more interconnected and intelligent system. These developments have
      greatly improved the coverage, transmission speeds, system stability,
      and networking flexibility of satellite networks, allowing for seamless
      integration across air, land, and space domains.</t>

      <t>This increasingly mature global satellite network has broken the
      traditional constraints of space information transmission, resulting in
      more efficient inter-satellite and satellite-to-ground data exchange.
      This has also laid a solid foundation for extending computing power into
      space. On one hand, the stable and reliable satellite links provide
      efficient interconnection channels for computing facilities such as
      in-orbit computing, data processing, and intelligent sensing. On the
      other hand, the widespread deployment of satellites has created
      opportunities for the distribution of computing nodes in space.</t>

      <t>This has led to the evolution of space computing power from isolated
      single-satellite operations to multi-satellite coordination,
      space-ground synergy, and global-scale orchestration. This evolution is
      crucial in building space computing networks and achieving ubiquitous
      computing services across all domains.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="conventions-and-definitions" title="Conventions">
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
      "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
      <xref format="default" target="RFC2119"/> <xref format="default"
      target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as
      shown here.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Use Cases">
      <t>Considering use cases on Space-Based Computing Infrastructure
      Network.</t>

      <section title="Emergency Response and Disaster Monitoring">
        <t>During natural disasters, such as earthquakes and floods,
        traditional communication and computing systems are at risk of damage,
        resulting in delays in the transmission of critical information.
        However, by utilizing satellite computing networks, emergency
        communication and computing nodes can be quickly deployed to process
        disaster imagery in real time. This allows for the creation of precise
        disaster maps and optimal rescue routes, providing decision support at
        a minute or even second level.</t>

        <t>This greatly improves the efficiency of disaster warning, emergency
        response, and resource allocation. Additionally, in the event of
        terrestrial network failures, these satellite networks can seamlessly
        provide communication and edge computing capabilities to support
        emergency command, drone search-and-rescue operations, and
        post-disaster reconstruction data processing.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Environmental Monitoring and Ecological Management">
        <t>nder traditional models, large amounts of raw satellite data, such
        as 0.3-meter high-resolution imagery, must be transmitted back to
        Earth for processing. However, due to limited satellite-to-ground
        communication bandwidth, less than one-tenth of the data can be
        transmitted, resulting in low efficiency.</t>

        <t>To address this issue, AI models can be deployed in orbit to
        perform real-time target detection, classification, change monitoring,
        and feature extraction on remote sensing imagery. This allows only
        critical analysis results to be transmitted to the ground, improving
        efficiency. This technology can accurately identify farmland, forests,
        water bodies, and glaciers, making it easier to track carbon sinks,
        monitor water environments, and track vegetation degradation.</t>

        <t>As a result, data utilization rates have increased from 10% to
        nearly 100%, greatly enhancing the timeliness and autonomy of national
        land resource surveys, environmental monitoring, agricultural
        assessments, and related fields.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Deep Space Exploration Mission Support">
        <t>Deep-space probes experience significant communication delays with
        Earth, with delays of several minutes being common for missions to
        Mars. This reliance on ground control can be inefficient.However, by
        deploying computational nodes in deep-space orbits, these probes can
        perform in-orbit preprocessing, compression, and intelligent filtering
        of data.</t>

        <t>This allows for coordination through inter-satellite communication
        networks, resulting in a significant reduction in the volume of raw
        data that needs to be transmitted back to Earth. This approach not
        only enhances the autonomous operation capabilities of probes, but
        also improves their mission response speed. It serves as a critical
        foundation for future long-term exploration missions to destinations
        such as the Moon, Mars, and beyond.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="In-orbit Training and Inference for Large AI Models">
        <t>Training AI models with hundreds of billions of parameters requires
        immense computational power, which can pose energy and thermal
        bottlenecks for ground-based data centers. However, by leveraging the
        distributed computing capabilities and green energy advantages of
        space computing networks, it is possible to distribute model training
        and inference.</t>

        <t>This approach provides a new "zero-carbon" computing pathway for AI
        development.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Requirements">
      <t>Considering requirements on Space-Based Computing Infrastructure
      Network..</t>

      <section title="Space-Based Computing Resource Monitoring">
        <t>Spaceborne equipment faces significant constraints in terms of
        computational resources, including CPU/GPU processing power, storage
        capacity, and energy consumption limits. These limitations are due to
        the size, power consumption, and payload capacity of the equipment.
        Additionally, the computational configurations of different satellites
        can vary greatly. Some prioritize edge computing, while others focus
        on data relay.</t>

        <t>Furthermore, the computational load of satellites can fluctuate
        depending on mission requirements. For example, sudden spikes in
        remote sensing data processing or IoT terminal access within a
        specific region can overload local satellites, while satellites in
        other areas may remain idle.</t>

        <t>This highlights the need for a technical solution that can monitor
        the computational load, available resources, and energy consumption
        status of each satellite in real-time. This data would then be used to
        support cross-satellite resource allocation.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="On-demand Traffic Scheduling">
        <t>Satellite networks support a wide range of service types, each with
        unique demands for network and computing power. For example, emergency
        communications require low latency and high reliability, while remote
        sensing data processing requires significant computing power but is
        less sensitive to latency. IoT data transmission prioritizes high
        bandwidth and low power consumption.</t>

        <t>However, a unified scheduling strategy may lead to issues such as
        "computing power mismatch" (e.g. assigning high-latency services to
        long-range satellites) or "resource wastage" (e.g. using
        high-performance computing satellites for simple data relay
        tasks).</t>

        <t>Therefore, it is crucial to establish a matching mechanism between
        service requirements and resource capabilities, including network
        resources such as link status, in order to enable efficient on-demand
        scheduling.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Conclusion" title="Conclusion">
      <t>This document makes some considerations on Space-Based Computing
      Infrastructure Network.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="security-considerations" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="iana-considerations" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119.xml"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174.xml"?>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
